Engineering and technical consulting for government programs, prime contractors, and companies building things that have to work.
Architecture and implementation for systems where correctness, performance, and maintainability decide whether the thing survives. We work through requirements, interfaces, failure modes, and deployment constraints alongside your team — and we write the code, not just the deck.
How we work in this discipline ↗Design and review of data models, schemas, access patterns, and migrations. We find the queries that will hurt at ten times the volume, the constraints that should be in the database instead of the application, and the migration path that does not require a maintenance window nobody will approve.
How we work in this discipline ↗Engineering for software that has to behave when conditions get bad. We work through what the system must do, what it should do when its assumptions break, and what evidence proves either — then build the error handling, tests, and observability that back it up.
How we work in this discipline ↗Design and implementation close to the metal. We work through resource limits, timing, peripheral interfaces, and device behavior — including what happens on brownout, on a wedged bus, and on the update that has to land in the field without a technician.
How we work in this discipline ↗Applied AI for teams past the prototype: retrieval and data design, tool and structured-output interfaces, evaluation harnesses that make a prompt change measurable, latency and cost budgets, and a straight answer about the places a model does not belong.
How we work in this discipline ↗A scoped build with milestones you can hold us to and working software at the end of each one — not a status deck.
An architecture review, a second opinion before you commit, or a standing seat at the table for the decisions that are hard to undo.
A defined work package inside your delivery team, with clean boundaries and nothing surprising in your status report.